🔗 Share this article

I possess a few thoughts about the remarks made by ESPN broadcaster a well-known announcer following the Serbian champion's win over the American player in the New York major quarter-finals. Look – Fritz is the United States, the commentator is from the US – and athletic competitions frequently encourage patriotic sentiment. Some disappointment was appropriate. Instead, Fowler invoked the ongoing absence of American men at grand slam tournaments: none of them has won a trophy since the last American champion in 2003, and Fritz had been the final representative in the tournament.

We all enjoy a narrative, myself included. But come on. Even if Fritz had beaten the legend for the first time, force of nature the Spanish star was waiting in the next round, who Fritz has yet to beat in an competitive encounter. And had he someway gotten past that, it would have been title holder the Italian, against whom Fritz had lost 10 of the previous eleven sets. The two young stars had also divided the previous seven grand slams (and Alcaraz proceeded to defeat a fatigued Djokovic in the next round). He said in press after the loss that he in fact liked his path, because it offered the chance to beat the top three players in the sport in succession. He is well justified to aspire to the achievement; an athlete is meant to have faith in themselves. But going into that Serbian last eight match who else sensibly had the drought of US winners in mind?

Coco Gauff’s weaker delivery the sole barrier standing in her way and sustained success

Fritz, 28, is ranked number four in the world entering the upcoming year-end championships and has secured his last six encounters over No 3 the German with increasing ease. It's likely he might claim that position for himself in the coming years. But evidently that at present, that’s as far as he can climb: The Italian and Spaniard sit a chasm of performance metrics away. His elite serve and powerful strength on each front side and backhand are sufficiently enough to dispose of most rivals on the professional circuit. Against the handful of once-in-a-lifetime players, though, Fritz is often helpless. The past few seasons has seen the interesting rise of tall, gangly players who can nonetheless cover the court with the alarming speed and fluidity of much shorter players. Fritz is 6ft 5ins and looks it. His movement is stiff, as if he hasn't fully adapted to his legs. So he seldom steal a point that the opponent was dictating, and hitting a drop shot versus him is usually a reliable tactic. That serves as a pretty severe limitation on his potential.

Fritz has made a number of significant, unexpected improvements over the years. At the beginning of the ten-year period, he was circling the bottom of the world's best thirty. Two years after, he was sniffing the elite ten. The previous season, he unexpectedly exploded to fourth place – and held the spot. But the subsequent step, competing against and beating all-time-greats like the young Spaniard, Sinner, and even a aging Djokovic, is the highest of all. What could the commentator thinking? That Fritz, in 2025, was a legitimate contender to beat them all back-to-back? That it was worth mentioning the ongoing slump of US male players lifting grand slams when he had exited the New York major in the quarter-finals? The thirst is simply too much and the respect for the difficulty of the task too little.

Taylor Fritz made a personal best advancement to the All England Club semi-finals in July.

Fritz’s performance in that very quarter-final should have been enough of an sign. The Serbian won in four sets, a win that only seemed uncertain for moments towards the conclusion, when the American had saved a few match points and had a opportunity to maintain serve for 5-5. The pair looked evenly matched during the exchanges, with Fritz earning plenty of opportunities to break. But the champion rescued service break opportunity after break point, extending the run to the brink of agony. When he eventually did claim one of the chances at 5-5 in the second set, he immediately played a terrible game to drop serve again; Djokovic had lulled him into a skirmish peripheral to the real battle and compelled him to expend far too much energy to win it. Down match points in the last game, his first serve sailed to heaven. He prolonged the match two times on his second serve, but ultimately double-faulted. It was not a choke, in my opinion, only a result of having to hit too many weaker deliveries.

The contest was quite compelling evidence that the American is not good enough to beat any version of Djokovic, who was defeated by the Spaniard in the next round and did not especially appeared like he believed he could triumph. This is perfectly acceptable – the Serbian is the best player ever, and may not be at the height of his athletic abilities anymore, but has developed enough knowledge and strategic intelligence to make up for quite a bit of the drop-off. The issue is the individuals who were anticipating Fritz to prevail, and pressuring him to do so, when he was yet to accomplished anything that indicated he could.

The American is an valuable contributor to the tour nonetheless. He’s a calm, thoughtful voice in press conferences, more so than almost everyone on the men's tour aside from Daniil Medvedev, willing to not only say his emotions or the tactic he believed decided a contest, but clarify it. That he ought to bear the brunt of the responsibility for the United States failing to spawn a male major champion since Andy Roddick feels unfair. (Since Ben Shelton is rubbing shoulders with him in the standings, perhaps they can divide that burden.)

ATP Finals: Player Divisions

American legend Group

• The Spanish phenom
• Taylor Fritz (US)
• Alex de Minaur (Aus)
• Lorenzo Musetti (It)

Bjorn Borg Group

• Jannik Sinner (It)
• Alexander Zverev (Ger)
• Ben Shelton (US)
• The Canadian talent

“I’d probably dwell on it forever if I don’t accomplish it,” Fritz informed an interviewer in June of winning a major. It is hoped he understands that he’s not unsuccessful if he doesn’t achieve that objective, that overcoming Alcaraz and Sinner’s young, terrifying empire is actually highly unlikely for all other players. {